Tiger Woods finally went on a birdie run, dropping five birdies in six holes on his first nine, the back, at Pebble Beach on Saturday morning. After we’d seen Tiger bomb drive and driver in the fairway and hit green after green on his approach shots for two rounds, he actually didn’t have the best ballstriking day, despite posting his best round of the week. As it always is, the difference came with his putting — he needed 27 in the third round at the AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am on his way to firing a five-under 67 and jump to solo third, trailing Charlie Wi by four shots.
For a while, it looked like Woods would be paired with Padraig Harrington, but as it turned out, the three-time major champ struggled in his last five holes, including two bogeys and a double-bogey to drop out of contention (though he and his sandbagger amateur partner J.P McManus are still leading the pro-am portion of the event.
A likeable underdog is searching for his first win on the PGA Tour, trying to keep his nerve and hold off Woods, Phil Mickelson and Dustin Johnson, two-time champ a Pebble, among others. Oh, and Phil and Tiger are playing together in the penultimate group at 12:29 ET. It really doesn’t get much better than that — which I wrote in my Saturday column on Golf.com.
“Today was key just for me getting off to a good start to settle Tiger’s nerves a little,” quipped Romo, a scratch handicap, who rolled in five birdies.
The duo posted a 19-under total despite getting no strokes to make the cut and advance to the fourth round.
Woods didn’t hit the ball nearly as well as he had the first two rounds, but he scored with a little help from his putter.
“I made some more putts, and really managed my game well today,” said Woods, who hasn’t won a full-field tournament since the 2009 Australian Masters and hasn’t won a PGA Tour event since the 2009 BMW Championship. “I missed in all the right spots, and even though my game was slightly off today, it’s not as off as it used to be, which is very good.”
…
As Wi and his caddie, Mark Urbanek, were reading a 40-foot putt for birdie on No. 12, Wi said, “Time to roll one of these in here, buddy.”
It did indeed go in.
Now the question is whether Wi will be able to hold his nerve on Sunday. He’s been open with the press about “fighting off demons” from past experiences. Perhaps playing with journeyman Duke in the last tee time on Sunday will take some of the pressure off.
As I’ve been tweeting, fans should stop camping out for an optimal seat to watch the Tiger-Phil show in the final round. I’d love to see Cousin Charlie hold off the bigger names, even though I picked Tiger to win by five at the start of the week and it’d be good for the game, but you know, it’d be great to keep it in the 韋 family (sorry, kind of an inside joke).
Oh, by the way, Arjun Atwal is truly a very good friend. Atwal has been battling a back injury the past week or so, but he didn’t back out and took one for his pal, who definitely enjoyed the company and comfort level that comes along with playing with his frequent practice round buddy. Had it been any other player besides Atwal, that guy would have been on the first flight home, and the other way around — had Tiger not been relying on Atwal’s company, he would have withdrawn. So for those making fun of Arjun’s play, you might want to eat your words! The guy really is Tiger’s BFF. Did we ever hear him even bring it up or complain, or show indication he was suffering through a strained back? Nope. What a class act.
Alright, so who you got tomorrow? I’m a little worried Charlie will start to hear roars in front of him on the back nine and begin to flounder. Just ask Matt Gogel, who knows all about Tiger pulling off the unthinkable coming down the stretch at this event. Rewind to 2000 — in fact, Gogel, who was the on-course announcer with Woods’ group on Saturday, had a flashback moment on No. 15…and joked about slapping Woods. Let’s save that story for tomorrow, though.
(AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)










So lets see: Tiger needs to be paired with his best bud, who plays despite an injury that would have sidelined anybody else. Also, per Steve Elling, there are 4 scratch ams in the tourney, and 2 of them are in the Tiger/Atwal group, presumably to avoid ticking him off with a hacker CEO. Can they bend any more backwards to make TW comfortable ? My guess is he pulls an Abu Dhabi today and finishes 7th to 10th.
IMHO, treatment like this (and since when do you get to pick who you will be paired with on the pro side ?) as well as granting him the totally undeserved/unearned exemption to play in Abu Dhabi opposite the Farmers are what led Tiger to believing he was above all rules and policies, which was part of what led to his downfall.
I hate it when the writers say Tiger winning would be best for the game of golf. Tigers been around a long time and I think he’s taken golf about as far as Tiger Woods can take golf. Which if you believe the rounds played in the country stats, he’s taken golf backwards. Yes purses have gone up but not at nearly the clip of salaries in the other major sports in the country. And he did all that before he was one of the most hated celebs in the country. It would be best for the game if a young star like Johnson won.
What the media means when they say Tiger is good for golf is that Tiger is good for TV ratings and web site traffic.
In my world these are two different issues.
What would be good for golf would be more courses where players could walk 18 holes in less than 4 hours for $50.
ATT-Pebble is in the business of doing what’s best for their tournament. What’s best for their tournament (ticket sales, ratings) is for Tiger to come back. Unlike Dubai (which he generally plays this week), this tournament isn’t paying Tiger an appearance fee, so they bend over backwards in other ways. Just smart business.
Oh and BrianS, Tiger isn’t the first guy to get the exemption despite not playing in 15 events the previous year (Norman), in fact I’d be surprised if it had ever been denied. That’s not special treatment.
@Shoshana – if you are telling me that is a rule that is essentially never enforced, that is one thing, but if you have to go back to Greg Norman for the last example, then I would say that qualifies for special treatment.
“Smart business” maybe, but “Just” smart business, hardly.
If Tiger gets to pick his playing partners isn’t the PGA essentially rigged.
Tiger winning would do wonders more than Dustin Johnson winning and I like Dustin Johnson. No disrespect intended towards him.
Guys, all the top players are afforded the opportunity to pick their partner. And even some of the not so top players! None of these pairing are random, a lot of thought goes into them.
Do a little homework on who JP McManus is and you’ll see that Paddy’s pairing was also a hand pick. Same for Sam Saunders and his Am partner (except in reverse, the Am made the handpick).
Can’t believe you all get so worked up about something you clearly know NOTHING about.
As for Tiger going to Abu Dhabi, annually every PGA Tour is given a certain number of waivers to play a conflicting/foreign event — Tiger simply used one of his. The tour has to approve the waiver but it’s more of a formality than anything else. Get over it.
@TASCAM – yes, they pick their AM partner, but not the pro they play with. Do you think Phil would have picked to play with Kevin NA for 3 days if he had any choice in the matter ?
Wah wah wah….Nothing ever changes.
I too was wondering about the Atwal/Tiger thing. Did any other pros get paired together like that?! It doesn’t really bother me that they did, unless they were the only two allowed to do so.
Anyway, looks like a good tourney here. I haven’t been watching–the celeb stuff bugs me–but I’m ready for the Sunday finale. Phil just eagled #6…
The PGA Tour manipulates pairings all the time as they see fit, to benefit the event. This is nothing new.
The USGA does the same. Remember when they paired Phil and Tiger together at the Torrey US Open to create buzz and bring attention to the event? Think Tiger wanted that pairing? Abu Dhabi did the same when they put Luke-Rory-Tiger together for their event. The PGA Championship manufactures all sorts of thematic pairings.
Sometimes pairings manipulation works to Tiger’s benefit, sometimes to his detriment…
True, but there’s a pretty big difference pairing 3 big stars together (for the fans’ enjoyment) and putting Tiger with Atwal (for Tiger’s comfort).
What’s the difference? Who do you think Tiger should have been paired with?
@TASCAM – how about Kevin NA?
For all you know Tiger and Kevin Na get along fine.
But aside from that, what’s your rationale for a forced Na-Woods pairing?
And BTW, Na’s partner is a 1-handicap that’s worth about $150 million and is an Augusta member (and about a dozen other top clubs), I’m sure Tiger would have been fine with the pairing.
You can’t see the difference?
Look, if every player gets to be tee off with their closest friend on tour, I’ve no problem with it. Maybe everybody’s golf will improve if they’re all playing with a friend they’re comfortable with. But I don’t think that happens. Manipulating pairings to be popular or for TV or whatever, fine; making one player more comfortable with the tourney, unfair.
I’m not sure why you keep bringing up the amateur partners, that’s irrelevant to this.
Because earlier someone was whining about the fact that Tiger got to hand pick his Am partner, and the fact that both Am’s in Tiger’s group were scratch.
So then it was suggested that somehow it was appropriate for Kevin Na and Tiger to be paired. Well, I think Tiger would have been fine with that. At this tourney in the 1st three rounds you wait on every single shot regardless of who the other pro in the group is. And Na’s Am partner has been club champ at lots of top places like Shinnecock, etc…so he is a good player and knows how to conduct himself on the golf course — so this wouldn’t have been a distraction either.
Hell, Tiger probably would have been better off being paired with Kevin, at least he could have seen a few putts go into the hole, maybe it would have rubbed off on him!
Life ain’t fair. And all veterans with multiple wins are afforded a lot of benefits that lesser players do not get. Including preferred tee times, better transportation, better pairings, etc… It’s all a fact of life on the PGA Tour, there is a pecking order.
And Tiger is at the top of the order.
I’m not disagreeing with anything you said; I just have never heard of one of the benefits of the veterans/winners being “playing with your closest friend on tour” before. Have you heard that before this?
Hell, for all we know, it was entirely randomly set-up and a coincidence. And I’m sure there’s no way to prove otherwise–but Steph seems to think it is so from her article. And really, did it actually have any affect on Tiger’s play, that extra comfort? Who knows?
But clearly he’s playing with Phil right now, they’re not best buddies, and he’s getting beat down pretty hard…
Brian S Good call on that 7th to 10th for Tiger.
He certainly hasn’t put up anything to be proud of today.
And I concur, it’s possible that this pairing is just what happened to get spit out of the computer. When you win a PGA Tour event you go into a different category and are generally paired with others that have won before. So Arjun would be in that category. Who knows.
However, regardless of how it happened, I feel reasonably certain it was not at Tiger’s behest. I do not believe he asked for the pairing. I do believe he was probably pleased when he saw it!
If anyone is angry about it, seems to me the anger should be directed at the PGA Tour officials…right? They are after all in charge of on site rules enforcement, policy, etc…
Oh well, even though the tour rigged the pairings to help Tiger, Phil gave him an old fashioned Sopranos style beat down and all is well.
Considering last time he teed it up at the PGA Tour was MC and T30, this week is a progress.
And also considering that since the Aussie Open, he has put himself in decent shape going into Sunday, even though he still unable to close them, it is in better place than a year ago.
I think Tiger has contracted Luke Donald disease, which is ironic since Luke has taken Tigers spot at the top.
Great match!
On the one hand you have an extremely likeable guy who loves his family and they love him, smiles a lot and always has time for the press, giving a honest and comprehensive interview and has a great relationship with his caddie and then there’s Tiger….
Cue the “Phil Wins” blog post full of backhanded compliments and thinly veiled insults in 3..2..1..
Being paired with Phil was the last thing Tiger needed, while trying to build confidence in his game. Phil has owned him for the last 4 years or so when they’ve been paired together. The only thing that could have gone worse for Tiger today is if Phil had literally – instead of just figuratively – kicked sand in his face.
@ MW – I think this week is really the best time for something focusing on the never say die playing of Ryan Moore or Wi’s trials and tribulations. Phil won – oh yeah, that happened didn’t it.
Guys you need to get your facts before you make out TW as the PGA Tour bully.The Tour put the only 2 scratch golfers Ams together for convenience sake, Atwal was paired with one. It is funny(bizarre) re the talk of the beatdown by Lefty of TW. This was not a match play situation so I dont get the hullabaloo. This is Lefty 4th tourney of 2012, and he did nothing in the prior 3 and now played brilliantly -found his game. Thats golf. why not allow TW to find his game in 2012 just like Lefty instead of spewing negativity. In 2011 TW game was nonexistent, he has improved greatly, at least he is putting himself in contention now .
@Rob – What have you been watching for the past 4 years that Phil owned TW.Again TW and Phil has never played each other in a match play tourney – whoever wins then you can call that a beatdown. See beatdown by Fowler of Phil in 2011 Accenture. By the way who has more wins in the past 4 years of your alledged beat down by Phil. As smart people says the player who wins a golf tourney beats all 150 golfers there that day. It is not a one on one sport
@SW -I dont get the TW phenomenon. I know for years prior to the scandal he was regarded as a golf robot, please!!!. The Abu tourney, it was all about Rock beating TW, somehow it was forgotten that the #1,2,3 4 ranked players were also in the field. The ones who have been lauded in 2011 as better than TW, yet except for #2 TW played better than they did. Now this Pebbles tourney is all about PM beating TW. PM is supposed to beat TW at this stage in 2012. Are we all about the media pandering to the baser instinct of readers, at the same time willing to portray another human being in such ill-will.
peachtree, the floor remains yours, please continue.
@peachtree – so you are saying it was just a coincidence that at Tigers’ first appearance here in 10 years he gets paired with his best buddy on Tour ? Please.
What the heck does the fact that this was a stroke play event have anything to do with the fact that Phil beat Tiger by 11 strokes and won the tourney for good measure ? And the fact it has been the 4th time in 5 outings over the past 5 years that Phil has achieved that same result when they were paired in the last round ? 2007 Deutch Bank, 2009 Tour Champ, 2009 HSBC. (Phil beat Tiger in the other one, the 2009, just didn’t win the whole thing).
And why was Phil “supposed to beat Tiger at this stage of 2012 ?” All we heard from the media up to and including this morning was how Tiger was set to dominate at Pebble, capping his return to the top echelon, if not the top spot. How many warmups does Tiger need before he is “supposed” to win when he starts out in the next to last group at one of his supposedly favorite courses?
It’s been a while since we’ve heard from the Tiger Apologist/Sycophant @peachtree
OK, I can’t read all the comments right now, but I just want to clear a few things up re: pairings.
*Tiger and Na weren’t paired together because the way it works is the first person to finish his round is paired with the person above…as in when there’s a T4 like there was on Saturday and Tiger was in solo third, the next person is whoever completed his round first. In this case, Phil and Na were playing together, so then you go to who teed off the last hole first. Phil did.
As for the pairings in the first three rounds being rigged? Obviously they are! It was no coincidence Tiger was playing with Romo and Arjun and some scratch handicapper. It was also no coincidence DJ was playing with three other South Carolinians. I mean, even John Peterson, a sponsor’s exemption, had his request to be paired with Harris English granted.
There is definitely a comfort level w/playing with your buddies, along with playing with amateurs that aren’t 15 handicappers. Most guys won’t admit it, but they will off the record…then there are some guys like Paddy who are saints and it doesn’t bother them…
My bad, 2009 Tour Championship Phil won, but not paired with Tiger. Tiger was in the group ahead I believe.
>I mean, even John Peterson, a sponsor’s exemption, had his request to be paired with Harris English granted.
Well, there’s our answer. Does this happen at other tourneys, or just here?
max, since it’s now proven that this wasn’t a Tiger-only perk I’m guessing nobody cares anymore. NEXT!
TASCAM hit on a good point with the Saunders group. I think if we dug deeper in to the pairing you would see plenty of “rigging.” Dick Ferris and his son wanted to play together as Ferris is a part owner of Pebble. He also is a very close friend of Arnold Palmer and plays out of Bay Hill. It was logical that he would pick Sam Saunders as his partner (and get him a sponsor’s exemption), but he also got another Bay Hill pro (Daniel Chopra) to fill out the group as his son’s partner. I don’t have the time or desire to look deeper at the round 1-3 pairings, but my guess is we would see plenty more “non-random” groupings.
kr1, exactly. Facts are a wonderful thing!
Now that the facts are presented, the haters can take off their tin foil hats.
So they cheated for Tiger and Arnies scrub grandson.
@Stephanie – Paddy isn’t a saint for playing with McManus, he has his eyes on the prize, or at least getting a prize for his billionaire buddy.