
Mature beyond his years, the US Open champion's sense of perspective may yet prove his Achilles heel.
Since Rory McIlroy lifted the US Open trophy at Congressional last June, he has played in 13 European Tour events, finishing outside the top-five on only two occasions.
Indicative of the extent to which both he and his game have become accustomed to the stresses and strains of a globetrotting schedule, it’s a run of form that has propelled the Northerner to within a single tournament of supplanting Luke Donald at the summit of the world rankings.
That such an outcome has been burdened with a sense of the inevitable, however, that consensus opinion should judge it nothing more than the logical realisation of a colossal talent, says as much about the condition of the game at-large as it does the 23-year-old’s impressive development.
Indeed, ever since a pesky fire hydrant brought the reign of one Eldrick Woods to a grinding, gyrating halt a little over two years ago, media and fans alike have searched in vain for a successor.
For golf is a sport obsessed with hierarchies. It ranks its players, tournaments, even its venues, compulsively. It’s a tendency taken to bloated, pathological extremes by season-long statfests like the FedEx Cup and the Race to Dubai, but one is capable of discerning its influence week-in-week-out on the PGA Tour, as the hefty burden of History (with a capital H) is dragged from one coastal resort to another.
Is Phil better than Tiger? Is Luke Donald a worthy No1? Will Lee Westwood ever nab a major?
All of this, the endless search for reliable context, is fueled by the desire for a clearly-defined elite. In simple terms, the sport needs champions, fearless multiple winners; they help link the golfing present to its mythic past.
McIlroy sets hopes and expectations soaring because his balance of affability, self-awareness and smooth-swinging elegance is suggestive of something timeless. Like his idol, the aforementioned Woods, his is a persona robust and televisual enough to support the dreams and aspirations of a sporting superstructure.
A perfect storm of marketable qualities, it’s suggested that he alone – as opposed to say, Martin Kaymer (too German, too ruthless) or Rickie Fowler (overhyped, contrived) – can become the pole star about which the Tour orients itself.
But to what extent are our hopes for the tyro at odds with the reality of his potential?
His game is defined by a nearly unrivaled capacity of overwhelm golf courses, and to look serenely untroubled while doing it. No grand displays of petulance, no helicoptered clubs or silent acts of violence.
As seductive a combination as that sounds (intimidating, if you happen to be an opponent), McIlroy’s maturity – a virtue for which he’s often lauded – places him at odds with the best to have played game. Equanimity, a close relative of diffidence, has never held the key to realising competitive potential.
From Seve to Jack, Arnie to Tiger, great players – those who come closest to justifying an already world-beating talent – have always been defined by their resilience: a refusal to accept defeat, no matter how honourable.
In golfing terms, it’s a trait that manifests itself as an ability to pitch and putt under pressure, to rescue a card or result by force of self-belief alone. A product of the murky subconscious, it lies beyond the remit of swing gurus and sports psychologists. It’s a skill that cannot be taught.
Somewhat troublingly, it’s also one McIlroy has yet to exhibit.
Of his five tournament victories, two have come courtesy of a final-round dogfight. A remarkable record, perhaps, but one undermined somewhat by a pair of major championship implosions, aswell as somewhere in the region of fifteen top-3 finishes and a further 30 top-tens.
The notion that McIlroy is somehow beyond the taming of his profligacy, an unwitting victim of psychological flaws beyond his understanding, is of course ludicrous. But if his desire – or lack of it – can already be considered a weakness, how likely is it that even greater wealth and acclaim will inspire the Northerner to seek a place in history commensurate with talent?
Conor Nagle









Conor.. Hunter Mahan won the Tournament and that’s 2 WGC Wins. Rory…has zero. Hunter crushed it at the Prez Cup and look in fine form. How bout showing some love to the dudes who actually play good golf.
American are dominating the PGA Tour
Every time we talk about the next Tiger all I am reminded of is that there is no next Tiger-at least not yet. Wake me when someone actually wins more than two tournament out of 5 and is in hunt week in and week out. Don’t get me wrong, I love the young guys, but no one is close to dominating as much as the press wants it to happen.
From this morning’s PGA Tour confidential,
“Mike Walker, senior editor, Golf Magazine: If you’re saying McIlroy — at 22 with two PGA Tour wins, including a major, and three more wins worldwide — can’t close the deal, then you’re only comparing him to one guy.”
This pretty much sums it up for me. You can open up his case again once he turns 30 and judge again.
I think the most relevant words in this entire article are “over-hyped.” Of course Conor used them in reference to Fowler, but I think they apply to Rory McIlroy. I appreciate his talent and his accomplishments at such a young age, but he is not Jack and he certainly is not Tiger. The media in their quest to have a successor to Tiger is trying to tell the rest of us that Rory is the next guy to transform the sport. They want us to believe that just because he shows promise of being an outstanding player they we should see him the generational super star. I’m not buying it.
Rory is a great player but it is not fair to compare him to Tiger nor Jack — he just doesnt measure up. A much better comparison is to Phil’s early career. Rory has been a professional golfer since the age of 17 and now 5 years later he has 4 victories. So in relationship to the Greats like Tiger and Jack — Rory has done nothing. Over-Hyped.
BTW .. why is the media being so dismissive of Hunter Mahan’s victory this past weekend. Rory didnt give that match to Mahan, he won it. Hunter beat Rory from beginning to end. I was one to the people saying that Hunter was a choker (not ready for prime time) after the Ryder Cup — but now happy to say that I was wrong.
FTR Rory has only won 4 times in his 5 years as a Pro. the US Open win is counted as a victory on the PGA and Euro tour.
tThe media should go ahead and crown McIRory the # 1 player in the world and get it over with. The media wants it bad and they want it now so they can start the hype now and get the love affair going with it. I think the media is just tired of the bunch out there right now. Even alot of the players are saying it’s going to happen soon. Rory really doesn’t really have to win anything if the media says he is #1.
In every sport, people are always looking for “The Next X.” We’ve been looking for the next MJ in basketball for 15 years. First it was Kobe. Then it was LeBron. Don’t me wrong, Kobe and LeBron are great, great, Hall of Fame players… but they are not half as good as MJ in his prime. And so it is with golf. People want “The Next Tiger” since it would appear that The Current Tiger has entered the “playing for the Washington Wizards and making Kwame Brown cry at practice” phase of his career.
People are latching onto to Rory, because, let’s face it, Rory is the most naturally talented and complete young player out there: DJ’s short game is way too erratic; Fowler’s swing is about as graceful as shopping cart falling down a flight of stairs (too much timing – ask young Sergio how that worked out); Simpson doesn’t have enough power; Kaymer has one shape – the high 5-yard fade – and so will never win The Masters or The Open Championship. So, yeah, I totally understand why people are jumping all over McIlroy. He IS the best under-30 player right now (and arguably the best in the world). He’s the most likely to do Tiger-like things in the future.
That said, I highly doubt he will ever reach Tiger-like heights. Tiger is one of the Golf God’s own prototypes – a model never intended for mass production. At the peak of his powers, Tiger was so much better than everyone else it was stupid. He was better in every phase – power, shaping shots, accuracy, short game/scrambling, putting, mental toughness – than every other player. Don’t me wrong, Rory is really, really good. He’s just not Tiger.
There a lot of words there to articulate a very simple point. If you look at McIlroy and compare his accomplishments to his piers, he has played well, if perhaps not as well as he could have. That’s it. If he had not been crowned as “the next”, his accomplishments would stand pretty well on their own. It’s a disservice to him and the game to label him anything other than what he is, a young skilled player. It’s really a reflection of our culture and our 24 hour media/reality TV/twitter/endless stream of speculation and coverage of every minute thing that we feel the need to judge a person on their accomplishments before they have even had a chance to accomplish anything.
On the main page here, there are 3 pic of Rory, 3 pics of Tiger and zero, nada, zip pics of the guy that won, whatever his name is??
Seems like all time icons like Bobby Jones, Jack, and Tiger only come around about once every 35 years. I suspect McIlroy is more Nick Faldo than Tiger Woods.
I think the jury’s still out on Rors, however, I would rather watch him than any other player.
That attractiveness is a quality shared by very few players over the past fifty years: Arnie, Jack, Seve, Tiger – that’s some company Rors is in…
There is no doubt Rory is a very good player but so far in his young career he is having trouble closing it out and thats the name of the game. So what is his problem? I don’t think anyone knows right now and he has plenty of time to get it done but he should be getting it done pretty soon, because the doubt may creep in big time.
Well Rory will be 23 in a few months, so far he has 4 wins. By the age of 23 Sergio had 7 wins.
Of course Rory has already demonstrated a mental toughness and ability to win a major that Sergio is still looking for at 32.
When attempting to figure out why I would generally start at the fact that last year Rory ranked 130th in strokes gained putting on the PGA Tour.
Rory is the best young talent that came onto the scene in the last 10 years. He will do well relative to his contemporary so long his heart is in the game.
As far as his inability to close, that is part of the learning curve. I am sure he is the same Rory from a year ago.
As far as being crowned the next great one, I wouldn’t rush to judgement until 4-6 years from now.
Until then, I will enjoy seeing him grow…
Correct me if I’m wrong (and I’m sure someone will), but Rory has neve been a dominant player. Not at any level. He didn’t dominant as an amateur nor has done it as a pro. So they can all just stop trying to sell his as the new Tiger.
In comparison to the NBA Rory is not even Lebron James, he may be Carmelo Anthony.
Shoshana, Rory has twice shot 80 after sleeping on the lead of a major. It’s nice for him to be able to say he’s a US Open Champion but degree of difficulty on that course was easier than a lot of regular PGA Tour golf courses. Personally I think his mental toughness is still a question mark, clearly physical talent is not. I’m eager to see him play a Sunday back 9 of a major under the gun and in a pack with some other players of note.
Oh we’ve had this very thread before. Right after the Masters, everyone was like, god Rory sucks so bad! Then what, 8 weeks later? What happened?
What the f do you people expect? 10 wins a year? Rory should have 6 majors by now? Oh, shut up. Someone earlier: “FTR Rory has only won 4 times in his 5 years as a Pro.” OK, but that’s GOOD. Yes, Sergio had more. Tiger had more. But that’s still a good rate, no an excellent one. If Rory wins one or two a year, he’ll have around 12-15 by the time he’s 30. Perspective time: Fred Couples only won 17 PGA/Euro tourneys in his ENTIRE CAREER.
Rory is young and on the right path. I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again, WINNING IS HARD. He’s in contention now every time he tees it up, and that is exactly what he has in common with the all-time greats. How high will he go? I don’t know. My guess right now is a career on par with Ernie Els, to be honest. But that, friends, is an amazing career.
Is “dominant player” really the benchmark we set for players now? Tiger or bust? Cripes
tascam: “It’s nice for him to be able to say he’s a US Open Champion but degree of difficulty on that course was easier than a lot of regular PGA Tour golf courses.”
so what does this mean? that 99% of the field besides rory can’t play golf? he crushed them, no matter how “easy” the course was.
Hi guys,
Woke up this morning and realised I’d included a howler of a typo in the penultimate paragraph. It has since been amended.
C.
I actually think Ernie has had a great career (and Phil), and if Rory reaches that I’ll be incredibly impressed. The way he’s being built up right now though is more than that, all I was saying is at this point that’s a bit of a reach.
Then again the last time I was snarky about Rory’s game, he went out and won the US Open. So people should prob bet the house on him.
g. rouge, it means Rory got hot. Just like Brian Gay got hot when he shot 20-under and won Hilton Head by 10 shots (Rory won by 8). Similar accomplishments.
At Congressional 22 players shot par or better. In the previous 8 US Open’s COMBINED only 24 players shot par or better. That was no US Open.
Congressional was just a run of the mill exercise in target golf, at which Rory excels. No wind, soft fairways, soft greens, warm, no rain, no stress. That’s not a major test.
If you like, here you can read more about how Rory prefers to play in these type of conditions: http://www.weiunderpar.com/post/mcilroy-not-a-fan-of-the-elements
Love the Rory as Carmello Anthony comment. Very apt comparison at this point.
Rory has tons of talent, just not getting it done quite enough to be all-time elite.
@MaxFischer — I agree with you — ahh sorta. My point — Rors should not be compared to Tiger or even Phil. Is it too much to just enjoy watching him play and see what he does.
I agree too that Rors is having a great career so far, but the media is trying to make him out to being “the great one” and he has done nnothing to justify that title.
There is only one dominant player in golf today — Yani Tseng.
You all still think Rory isn’t “getting it done quite enough”? Everyone who posted here… SMH.
In re-reading the comments here, it appears that everyone thinks Rory is pretty great, but regardless his hype has him at a “greater than Els / super-dominant” level and that’s what you are disagreeing with? Stop being ridiculous. Hype is stupid and often hyperbolic, I agree. But Rory does deserve his #1 ranking, and I see literally no reason he doesn’t have 15+ wins by the time he’s 30. That would be pretty dominant.
Anyway, pretty awesome how after the Masters everyone ripped him apart, and then he came out and won the US Open. Same thing happened, on a smaller scale of course, last week and this. That ability right there is the sign of a top dominant player.