Tiger Woods spent much of Tuesday’s media session at the Masters defending himself — first against Twitter machine Ian Poulter, and mostly against writers questioning whether the best days are behind the 14-time major champion.
First, Poulter’s honest assessment of Tiger’s chances this week:
“I don’t think he’ll finish in the top five,” said the world’s 16th-ranked player with a frankness that has become as much a trademark as his taste in pink trousers. “The shots he was hitting at Doral [the venue for the recent world golf championship, in which Woods finished 10th] were very inconsistent. You can’t afford to hit shots like that on this golf course [Augusta National] and get away with it. I don’t think you want to rely on your short game that much around this place.
“You can never rule him out – he has such an incredible record on this golf course. We’ve seen him hit the shots in various situations when he has put himself in trouble and he has one of the best short games in the world – that will not disappear from him. When he gets in position where he’s close, he generally holes putts at the right time. He hasn’t done it for a while but I think if he starts to hole the putts at the right time then you will see the Tiger of old come out and that’s dangerous. But I don’t see it this week.”
He’s spot on, no? Poulter has since recoiled via Twitter because of the pro-Tiger backlash/media sensationalism, tweeting:
“Note to self when asked about Tiger always bullshit & say what they want to hear, or you will be ridiculed. Noted not answering anymore.”
The media thirsts for the quote, and then kills you for it. I gotta take Poulter’s side here.
The opposite of Poulter is, of course, Tiger, who gives one-word answers, um-hmms, and dry, Belichickian responses, because, well, you know what happens if an athlete of his stature speaks his mind. (See LeBron James.) Woods was asked about Poulter’s projection, and quipped, “Poulter’s always right, isn’t he?”
Aside from that manufactured tiff, Woods took on an onslaught of questions about his game.
Asked if he feels his game is sound enough to win, Woods flashed that trademark smirk and grunted an affirmative.
“Ummm, hmmm,” he said.
Like, with which parts?
“Everything,” he said.
And…
Despite a career-worst drought that stretches back 19 months without a PGA Tour title — he hasn’t won at Augusta since 2005, his longest winless skein in the four majors — Woods never hesitated when asked if we had seen his best days.
“No,” he said sharply, offering no illumination.
Pressed, given that the current facts don’t fit his premise even remotely, Woods laughed. Maybe this falls under the heading of whistling in the graveyard, but he sounds like he’s not lacking for confidence in spite of the fact that he hasn’t contended in months.
“Well, I believe in myself,” he said. “There’s nothing wrong with believing in myself. God, I hope you guys feel the same way about yourselves. You know, that’s the whole idea, that you can always become better.”
I personally was most interested when he talked about losing in a playoff to Graeme McDowell at the Chevron World Challenge. Well, he did lose, you just couldn’t tell from the way he described it. It sounded like, I don’t know, he had just won his fifth green jacket.
“I had played so well for three rounds, and then I was so excited the entire year came down to one shot and I pulled it off, one shot on the 72nd hole when I had to hit it in there stiff, and I did it. Unfortunately I haven’t been in the same position where I have had to hit a golf shot where I needed since then on the last hole.”
He did lose, right?
(AP Photo/Dave Martin)










Why do these reports always sound like the players just sit down and talk freestyle about anything that crosses their mind ? Poulter was asked the questions that led to these answers. He answered honestly and without malice toward Woods – which is what they complain that Woods doesn’t do – so it’s dirty pool to turn around and spin his words into something he didn’t intend. Can you blame him for being upset ?
I thought Tiger was pretty chatty through most of the press conference – right up to the point where cliche questions about his thoughts on winning the tournament came up. Then he went into his traditional answers designed to let you know he’s the man to beat…even if it isn’t so right now.
Backing Poults all the way with his comments – this revolting trend of sensationalism instead of journalism needs to stop. He’s given a frank and honest answer (and pretty accurate, really), and is now the villain of the piece, in a “headline grabber”. What do “journos” want to hear from players? Scripted answers or honesty? Sadly, if every time a player gets pilloried for the latter, then you understand the whole “media training” approach by some players. And in which case, why bother….
Think your being a little harsh on Tiger there, his last two pre-tournament press conferences (this and Arnie’s) he’s been a lot more pleasant, open and talkative with the media. He’s never going to be charasmatic, it’s not in his nature. Also, I’m sure it gets pretty mundane answering the same questions every week (OK every 3 weeks with Tiger!). I’ve seen many an interview with Poulter where he’s given one line answers and shows little interest in being interviewed after a poor round of golf. Perhaps we expect too much.
Let’s take a positive note from the presser, he didn’t once say “it is what it is”!!
Poulter is more interested in painting his nails pink, doing his hair, and tweeting like a school girl than playing golf. He knows full well there will be backlash when he talks about Tiger but does it anyway for the attention. Then he acts surprised that so many people comment on it. He’s been running his mouth for years but hasn’t won jack. Tiger 14 majors, Poulter 0.
Certain things never change. It goes like this:
Step I: Media ask dumb questions
Step II:Tiger gives standard and rehersed answers instead of calling them dumb questions
Step III: Media bitches and whines about Tiger not being forth coming
Repeat: next Tiger Woods news conference.
Not: as you can see, the media is heavily invovled in this ridiculous proceeding.
Poulter is the Paris Hilton of golf (except she reads more). Win something big and then brag like a donkey, not vice-versa.
@Calvin.. Poulter won a WGC last year, thats pretty big.
Poulter gave an honest answer to a question, that’s fine he also added a lot more after the answer which didn’t get repeated (duh). Of course, Tiger finished several shots in front of Poulter at that tournament in Doral.
As to the Tiger presser, seriously how would you like him to answer that question? No, he doesn’t think he can win? Tiger and Phil are different people and going to give different press conferences, but the tone and type of questions are also totally different. When Tiger is asked about changes to the game, twitter whatever etc he gets a lot more engaging, then when asked the same old questions.
I like Bill Plaschke’s take on the sadness of what Tiger has become:
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-plaschke-tiger-woods-20110406,0,7941454.column
But then he immediately gets crucified in the comments for speaking the truth, so like Poulter, why bother. Just pretend that Tiger is the same Tiger. Nothing to see here. Nothing to report. Carry on.
Oh and Stephanie: When you start to feel all squishy this week, reporting from the venue filled with history and nostalgia, just remember Tiger’s quote. “Driving down Magnolia Lane is just looking at some trees, really”.
The more trouble Poults gets in for his comments, the more I seem to like him. I WANT the players to give honest answers to questions. As SW and others here have correctly pointed out, if players get pilloried every time they answer something honestly… then all we’ll get from them in the future is the predicable sound bites.
@Sahalee Joe I read the Plaschke piece, and I think he extrapolated a little to much from a fairly standard Tiger press conference. I do think that Tiger looks tired (maybe he should go back on the ambien), although I think he’s looked less tired in the last few weeks.
I do agree with Plaschke that Tiger desperately wants to be in the competition, but I don’t think it’s desperation, I think Tiger loves to win, and be in competition. He’s said much the same thing in many news conferences even prior to 2009 about wanting to be in the hunt back 9 on Sunday.
A couple thoughts:
The greatest golfers seem to be the best forgetters when it’s helpful to do so.
We should all beg Poulter to answer truthfully. What is so WRONG with having an opinion? We all do.
not to veer off course here, but i loved tiger’s non-answer to the british jackoff journalist who tried to ask a question about wayne rooney (soccer player) and his suspension for swearing.
Used car salesmen.
Lawyers.
Sports writers.
Plaschke always have an axe to grind with Tiger Woods, so whatever he extrapolates you can ignore. He writes as if he lives in Woods house and a personal friend of his.
It is weird that I watched the press conference and read the transcript and did not come away with the same feelings as the blogger, maybe it is because we are not the media.
I personally thought the Woods answers were spot on and non-confrontational, which is what Woods is. Woods answer regarding Poulter was sublime and obviously over the heads of the Media.(Poulter had said a few years ago that soon it would just be Tiger and him,#1 and #2 in the world)
My only beef with Poulter is that altough he is speaking “truth” I dont think golfers should comment on the state of other golfers game. Every week is a different one and playing good one week does not necessarily mean that next week your game will be good or vice versa
i’ve seen some criticism of woods’ statements regarding the magnolias as “just trees.” totally taken out of context since he went on to laud the course and the rest of the grounds.
To be fair, he only lost because McDowell holed a crazy long/difficult birdie putt. Tiger still hit a great shot.
Matt
If it is not a major, it is just a wannabe. (At least if you are gonna bray like he does)