Phil Mickelson was moping around the Monterey Peninsula Country Club’s Shore Course, posting a ho-hum even par on his first nine (the back) in the second round of the AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am. Then, the sunny skies from the morning turned to overcast skies and eventually rain, which hadn’t been in the forecast, started to fall steadily (and annoyingly) on his second nine.
About the same time the weather rolled in, Mickelson, who hasn’t been known for his prowess in wet and windy conditions, experienced a change in his mood and game, which eventually led to his splendid eight-under 64 in Sunday’s final round to cruise to the winner’s circle for the fourth time at Pebble Beach.
Amy Mickelson, his wife, flew in on Friday morning and lifted her husband’s spirits — and his game — with her bright smile and positive energy, along with a few words of support when she showed up on the 3rd tee at MPCC.
“What I think was the change in momentum for him was that at MPCC when the weather turned. I was at -10 and finished at -7,” said Kevin Na, who played with Mickelson in the first three rounds. “He was at -4 and finished at -7. The chip-in on No. 4 from 45 yards was key to changing the momentum for him.”
It’s no coincidence that Mickelson chipped in right after his wife arrived.
Mickelson’s pro-am partner, Barclays’ executive Skip McGee, agreed with Na’s assessment.
“The other thing that happened was that she showed up at No. 3,” said McGee, pointing at Amy, who was standing a few feet behind me. “He had five birdies on the back nine, including four of the last five holes.”
Jim “Bones” Mackay, Mickelson’s caddie, also noticed the transformation.
“The crazy thing was, at MPCC he shot par his first nine holes in perfect conditions, and then he shot 29 on the back in horrific conditions,” Mackay said on Sunday. “I think he picked up a lot of momentum from that and carried it to today.”
While Amy wouldn’t take credit for helping Phil shift the momentum back his way, she didn’t need to because her husband readily did.
“ I was moping,” admitted Mickelson, who fired a five-under 65 in the second round to surge into contention before eventually winning by two in Sunday’s final round. “I mean, like I was moping. It was terrible. And she said, ‘Come on now, cheer up, let’s go make some birdies, come on,’ and she was so positive and it just changed my attitude, (along with) playing one of my favorite golf courses…And I ended up making some birdies.
“I didn’t even really think I was in position to win at the moment but I just had a nice round. And it was really an attitude change that she instilled coming out with her bubbly, positive attitude that got me going. I told her that in the car that it wouldn’t have been possible without that talk.”
***********
Mickelson likely also had confidence because of his recent success when facing Woods head-to-head. In the last 12 times he and Woods have been paired, Mickelson has beaten him eight times, including this week. Mickelson, 41, clearly thrives when paired with Woods, but that wasn’t always the case.
“I feel like he brings out the best in me,” Mickelson said. “It’s only been the past five years. Before, I got spanked pretty good. Let’s not forget the big picture here; I’ve been beat up. But the last five years, I’ve been able to get some of my best golf out when we play together.”
And this screenshot of SI.com’s front page sums up one heck of week (I think I blacked out by Wednesday), but I really enjoyed the opportunity to cover the event as the primary correspondent for SI/Golf.com at Pebble. (Sorry, it’s a little hard to read the fine print below the main headline and pictures, but try squinting — I hear that helps.)
‘Til next time.
(AP Photo/Eric Risberg)











Great win by Phil. What a joke it is that The Chevron World Challenge awarded Tiger 44 points for his W, vs the 38 for a full field win at Pebble Beach.
They are both big stories for sure. Don’t know that it was as much of a melt down as it was giving up… He just went through the motions on the back 9 and the biggest difference in him that I saw was the short puts, and instead of getting all of the good breaks, he got all of the bad. Just bad karma… it goes with the territory. ;o)
Tiger hit the ball very very well for 3 days, and really didn’t hit it that bad on Sunday.
Kudos to Phil for a great Sunday round and getting himself some motivation for the rest of the season! Good to see him in the winners circle!
Don’t know what Tigers real deal is, but he just doesn’t have the killer instinct anymore. His demeanor has changed and he needs to overhaul his putting more than his swing…
At this rate, Tim Finchem is going to have to position The Chevron as the 5th Major to keep Tiger’s comeback on the rails.
Shooting 75 over 6,800 yds with soft greens is astounding.
Phil continues to surprise with his out-of-nowhere type of golf. I guess in some cases, current form doesn’t count for much.
Tiger’s wedge game was brutal. He is so steep that he couldn’t control the spin, especially on sloped greens like Pebble. I’ve heard more than a few people claim he hit the ball fine yesterday, I think he was pretty poor.
Was great to see Mickelson play so well. I was starting think his health issues were maybe worse than we know. I think playing with Woods gets his juices flowing more than anything. Woods has the Sunday blues, that’s for sure. But sooner or later, he’ll figure it out. It was odd to see him miss all those short putts yesterday.
Woods is benched on my Fantasy Golf team on Sunday unless he has a 5 stroke lead.
But Phil beat him by 11 yesterday, so maybe 5 strokes isn’t enough. Either way, for Tiger to shoot worse than Tony Romo on Sunday at Pebble isn’t good.
It seems like there are two separate stories here; one is Phil being Phil, the other is Tiger’s completely screwed up head.
I don’t know if it’s a matter of Amy’s pep talks, minor adjustments from Butch, or (completely understandable) distractions, but trying to handicap how Phil will play from week to week seems impossible. Golf is a strange game sometimes but Phil’s results are even stranger.
I think at this point it’s fair to say Tiger’s swing is back, but his head isn’t. Granted he got a lot of bad breaks on Sunday at Pebble, but his play the last two weeks in the final rounds has been chock full of mental errors. I watched him bogey a par 5 playing against Robert frigging Rock by short-siding himself with a wedge in his hands! Was it because he got too aggressive and just missed by a few feet? Is his new swing just that unreliable under pressure that he completely blocked it and missed a wedge shot by 10-15 yards? And that’s before you get to all the three-puts. His game reeks of being afraid of “the moment.” It’s hard to believe we’d ever say that about Tiger, but let’s be honest about where he is.
How can you be moping playing the 3 courses @ Pebble.
That just ain’t right.
The thing about Phil was he actually had a lot of good scores this year so far. Look at the Hope/Humana – 74/69/66/69. Only one truly bad day led to his 49th place (tho those may be slightly high scores there). Then in San Diego, he went 77/68. In Phoenix he was playing decently until the 73 on Sunday. So while the end results have been pretty poor, he has been shooting some good scores. Not defending those performances, just that his form was closer than most are saying. And so this week wasn’t such a surprise. All he needed was to be a bit better engaged, and playing Tiger, and his wife showing up, did that for him.
The real truth is that Wood’s swing has never been the problem. Look at how many different philosophies he has had with different teachers over the years, and he has won with all of them. The fact is that right now he is dealing with confidence issues and inner demons that he never used to have. This last swing change is just a desperate attempt and trying to get that confidence back. Look no further than his putting woes and you can see that his once unbreakable focus is no more.
My armchair psychology on Tiger is this: As @MW said, his focus and dedication to his game and to winning was once unbeatable. But what if he has come to the conclusion that the end result of this mental state and dedication to being the greatest of all time is the kind of person that would betray his wife, and more importantly negatively impact the lives of his kids forever. And as the kids get older, there will be a constant reminder – what happens when Elin gets remarried and another “Dad” enters the picture. In other words, the very dedication and focus to his goal that was his biggest strength was in reality his worst enemy? If he were to come to that conclusion, how could he continue as before ? Where do you get redemption from that: by winning more golf, or passing Jack ? Hopefully he will learn and grow, but it might mean a worse golfer over the rest of his career.
Good points BrianS. Tiger probably can’t beat Jack’s “record” now even if he bags enough Majors . . . because Jack did it while being a great husband, father, and representative of professional golf. Americans love stories of overcoming and redemption, though. So his story, and his struggles, will always be entertaining to watch . . . even if his golf isn’t. And pro sports are simply entertainment. Playing golf is real golf.
It’s amazing what the influence of another person close to you can often bring out the best in a person. In this case it was Phil’s wife Amy.
Great win by Phil!
Sure, Tiger’s perhaps the greatest golfer of all time. But, psychologically, Phil has owned him over the last few years. Watching Sunday, I half expected Tiger to start licking Phil’s golf shoes.
If Tiger contends at Augusta he better pray that he’s not paired with Phil on Sunday.
Tony says that when Phil sank his par putt on 12, he tore out Tiger’s heart and ate it in front of him!
Luv it!
All I know is that Augusta is going to be really interesting this year. Tiger & Phil playing decent – it should keep us riveted to our flat screens!
Hey tiger, tell me how my as$ tastes
And hey, by the way, I was so impressed by all the energy and youthfulness exhibited by Clint Eastwood in the Tower with Nantz and Faldo. I can tell he’s really going to move that Back Nine Network thing forward and really bring all the young people into the sport – what a breath of fresh air he’s going to be as executive director.
Everyone gets too wrapped up in their own head sometimes, and you just need someone to knock you out of it. Sounds like Amy did that for Phil on Friday.
Different mindsets:
Phil is extra motivated when playing with Tiger because Tiger is the benchmark.
Tiger is interestd in beating history, not Phil. At this juncture, he is looking to beat his own self.
@KC – you are right, and as far as Phil, what so many people don’t get is how great it is for him to have Tiger around. Its like in boxing, if you were a heavyweight contender, would you rather be in the Ali era or in the era that Larry Holmes/Spinks were at the top ? You might have a better chance at winning against Holmes, but against Ali, you can go against the best there ever was. Its like being a pitcher in the days of Babe Ruth. They all would know that Babe was ultimately a better player than they were, but to have the chance to strike him out, or to shut him down for a game when the Babe is really, really trying to hit a homer or whatever ? That is what competitors live for, and Phil is a competitor.
Yeah, seriously, Phil should have gotten more points for this win. The World Golf rankings certainly have their flaws, that’s for sure.
No, there was barely any top of the world rankings at Pebble. The best were DJ at #10, Phil and Tiger were #17 & 18. Meanwhile, #2, 3, 4 were all at the Dubai tourney. I think some of these Euro Tour fields are definitely stronger than the PGA ones nowadays. So I think the weight of Pebble was about where it should be.
Though I will agree: perhaps a tougher course should be worth more points? Also maybe Phil dropping such a flawless round on a Sunday should somehow help his rankings.
This week’s tourney in LA though is stacked, it will be worth quite a few points.
The Euro tour only occasionally has stronger fields. This week the Riviera winner is going to get 62 points where the Euro tour winner in India will get 24.
I don’t have any issues about the Euro tour vs. PGA in this instance. The Chevron is what gets me ticked the most. Not only did Tiger get more points for winning (44 vs. 38), but Nick Watney, who finished DFL (18) at that “event” gets the same points as a guy who finished T20 in a field of 150 participants, including a mid-way cut.
The OWGR does have flaws, but Dubai only had 3 of top 25 same as pebble and gave out 48 pts to 38. Pebble had many more in the 50-200 range. BTW Chevron had way more top 25 players than either Dubai or ATT.
OWGR rewards having top players, period. Chevron had more top players, it’s the same bias in any event. Oh and Nedbank gave out 38 points.
But those 3 Dubai guys were the very top, highest ranked players. Pebble’s weren’t. So to say “same as Pebble” is misleading.
My point was, the rankings follow the top Euro players right now. So when I say Euro Tour is worth more, that’s why. The last few tourneys in Dubai and Qatar had Rory, Lee, Kaymer, Schwartzel, etc. and that in turn even pulled Jason Day and some guys like that. Much stronger fields than Pebble and Phoenix. Where the top-10 go, so do the OWGR points. That won’t change until Americans take over the top-10 a little better.
OWGR is like 4th grade math http://dps.endavadigital.net/owgr/doc/content/OWGRPT12.pdf The only flaw I see in it is you are guaranteed points just for showing up at limited field events.
@Max, yes the owgr pts go with the top ranked players, that’s why limited field events can give out so many points.
If you think that owgr points should go with top ranked players, then there’s nothing wrong with limited field events giving out a ton of points. If you think depth should matter more, then how many points Dubai gave out vs Pebble should bother you. Both are valid positions.
@Shoshana – in my opinion, the WR points you get should reflect the following equation: How well you did X a factor/multiplyer to reflect how tough it was to win or to achieve whatever you achieved.
So for the Chevron vs. Pebble, while they had more top players at the Chevron, there is no adjustment made for the fact that the field was so small, as well as no cut. So I think it overvalues the winner. But again, what to me is more outrageous than what Tiger got vs what Phil got, was the fact the the last place guy Watney, got more points than someone who finished T20 @ Pebble, which means that he beat some 100 odd participants, and made a halfway cut. I think a T20 at any event is way harder to achieve than basically not being DQed at Chevron. To fix it, I would say only the Top 5 guys (which is about the same ratio of the # of players got any points at PB) should get any WR points for a limited field event such as Chevron, Tour Championship, WGC, ect.
FYI, here are the respective Points from both Chevron and the top of the field for PB:
1 Tiger Woods 44
2 Zach Johnson 26.4
3 Paul Casey 17.6
T4 Hunter Mahan 11.88
T4 Matt Kuchar 11.88
T6 Jim Furyk 7.59
T6 Bubba Watson 7.59
T6 Martin Laird 7.59
T6 Rickie Fowler 7.59
T10 Gary Woodland 5.94
T10 Bo Van Pelt 5.94
12 K.J. Choi 5.28
T13 Webb Simpson 4.62
T13 Bill Haas 4.62
15 Jason Day 4.18
16 Steve Stricker 3.96
17 Keegan Bradley 3.74
18 Nick Watney 2.4
1 Phil Mickelson 38
2 Charlie Wi 22.8
3 Ricky Barnes 15.2
4 Aaron Baddeley 11.4
T5 Kevin Na 8.36
T5 Dustin Johnson 8.36
T7 Padraig Harrington 6.46
T7 Ken Duke 6.46
T9 Greg Owen 4.75
T9 Brendon Todd 4.75
T9 Jason Kokrak 4.75
T9 Spencer Levin 4.75
T9 Jimmy Walker 4.75
T9 Kevin Streelman 4.75
T15 Hunter Mahan 3.236
T15 Steven Bowditch 3.236
T15 Bob Estes 3.236
T15 Tiger Woods 3.236
T15 Richard H. Lee 3.236
T20 Davis Love-III 2.348
T20 Brian Gay 2.348
T20 Robert Garrigus 2.348
T20 Ryan Moore 2.348
T20 Brian Harman 2.348
T25 Danny Lee 1.94
T25 Kevin Stadler 1.94
T25 Geoff Ogilvy 1.94
T25 Vijay Singh 1.94
@BrianS I think the owgr overvalues having a few top players, have said that for a while. It’s one of several changes I would make to the OWGR. I’m not arguing good or bad, just saying OWGR philosophy and that you see it in any areas.
Personally as it relates to field depth/size: I think the OWGR should award more points for 100-200 in the owgr and some points for 200-300. And only players who finish in the top half of any tournament should receive points, no matter how low they’d otherwise go.
Fantastic issues altogether, you just won a new reader. What may you recommend in regards to your put up that you just made some days in the past? Any positive?