16-year-old American Lexi Thompson trumped the history books on Sunday, beating the field by five shots at the Navistar LPGA Classic to become the youngest winner ever on the LPGA. During a tough stretch for the struggling women’s tour that’s lacking star power and trying to remain relevant with only 23 events on its schedule — the lowest number since 1971 — Lexi’s dominant victory couldn’t have come at a better time.
But LPGA commissioner Mike Whan delivered a major buzzkill.
Normally, a win would be enough to be granted membership on the LPGA, but at 16 years, 7 months and 8 days, Lexi doesn’t meet the age requirement of 18.
To become a member, Thompson would have to petition the LPGA to waive the 18-year-old age requirement, which the tour already waived for qualifying school. On Sunday, Whan sounded like Lexi would have to endure the last two stages of Q-school (she won the first stage in July by ten shots). “Should Lexi qualify for LPGA membership via her Q-School performance, she will be an LPGA member for the 2012 season,” Whan said in a statement.
I’m still scratching my head trying to figure out how the LPGA and Whan managed to take a win-win situation served to them on a silver platter and turn it into a PR flop.
“It’s kind of silly,” veteran Juli Inkster said. “I think it makes us, the LPGA, look bad too. She has proved she can play out here. Now you have to go to qualifying school? To me that’s silly.”
That’s been the general consensus.
I understand Whan thinks he’s doing the right thing by citing tour protocol, but sometimes the “right” thing isn’t black and white. I’m having a hard time picturing PGA Tour Commissioner Tim Finchem making such a mess of a golden PR opportunity. Finchem probably would have issued a statement, saying something like, “Congratulations to Lexi for her incredible achievement. While she has to officially petition the tour to wave the age requirement, we expect it to be approved and we look forward to welcoming her as a member starting in the 2012 season.”
Thompson’s agent Bobby Kreusler was already busy writing the petition on Monday, according to GolfChannel.com’s Randall Mell.
“We are going to be filing a petition, but I don’t want to say anything more at this point,” Kreusler told Mell. “It’s not something we want to focus on during the week of the Solheim Cup.”
By all accounts, Whan seems like a straightforward and fair commish, and under normal circumstances, his comments would have been the right call. I understand the concerns the Tour’s facing when dealing with teen prodigies — there are plenty of bad stories that come out of kids turning pro too early and the LPGA doesn’t want to exploit a 16 year old. Good on them, but she’s playing, anyway, so why continue having a combative relationship with the Thompson family and embarrassing themselves in the process?
Lexi has proven she can compete and dominate at an LPGA event. She’s from a golfing family where one older brother, Curtis, plays at LSU and the other, Nick, competes on the Nationwide Tour. She’s made it clear she wants to devote her life to playing professional golf and she’s proven she’s mature enough to handle the downsides of the limelight.
Golf Channel on-course announcer and interviewer Jerry Foltz, who has covered every LPGA event aired on the Golf Channel except for the Navistar, was impressed with Lexi’s composure after a disappointing finish. Entering Sunday with a tie for the 54-hole lead at the Avnet LPGA Classic in May, Lexi shot 78 in the final round, including two double-bogeys on the final nine. Lexi was understandably pretty upset and initially refused the interview, but her dad and agent talked to her, and at the last minute, Lexi agreed to speak with Foltz, who said she handled herself with “the emotional poise of a 30-year-old woman.”
I agree with Whan and the LPGA’s concerns and precautions — a precedent shouldn’t be set so any 15- or 16-year-old should be able to join the pro ranks, but each case should be judged independently. With Lexi’s already-impressive resume (T2 at ’10 Evian Masters, T10 at ’10 US Women’s Open, etc.), her dominating performance and ability to close out in style (she birdied 16 and 17 for the KO) speaks for itself.
I said this in our roundtable over at Golf.com, but I’ll say it again: It’s not the LPGA’s job to parent. The tour’s job is to give the best players in the world a place to play.
(To be honest, I’m not a big fan of throwing teens onto the professional circuit and I don’t think I’d make some of the same parenting choices — home-school, turning pro at 15 — but Lexi’s situation is an exception.)
“It was really special to watch Lexi yesterday putting her name in the history books,” Foltzy told me on the phone. “Her ensuing petition for membership should be nothing more than a formality. I couldn’t fathom that it would ever be anything but assured.
“If she is forced to play in the second stage of Q-school to qualify for a tour that she just dominated this weekend, then I’m missing something.”
(AP Photo/Dave Martin)


September 19th, 2011 on 6:50 pm
Lexi’s petition should clearly be approved, and Whan blew it big time PR wise with that release. I totally agree w/you re: it’s not the tours job to parent.
That being said she’s already shown the maturity to handle the limelight? We have no clue how she’ll end up handling the limelight. I can almost guarantee you though that at some point she will screw up. Given that the LPGA is a sports tour though, as long as she isn’t doing something against the rules though, it’s not the tours job to police.
September 19th, 2011 on 6:53 pm
You got the point and then sent it out for a beer, Steph.
If Whan just hands Lexi a card, he removes any control the LPGA has over situations like this in the future – the precedent will have been set. Having her put in a petition for a card under the win rule leaves the LPGA in control for future cases. Sure – it’s probably just a formality in this case, but it is a VERY important formality. Some kid, most likely an amateur, who gets hot and lucky some week and happens to win an LPGA event will still have to undergo some scrutiny by the Tour before just handing out Tour PRIVILEDGES to some kid who would be better off staying amateur.
The Thompsons aren’t your ordinary golf family – they have a lot of experience with professional AND amateur golf, and know how to deal with the pressures and demands on both sides. They have done a great job raising Lexi and her maturity is recognized.
September 19th, 2011 on 7:01 pm
The process is there for a reason. Just follow it and everything will be fine. People demanding some sort of instant welcome are being a little unrealistic. She will be on tour next year, no doubt about it
September 19th, 2011 on 7:27 pm
One request though when she gets on tour, can we let her be 17 and a great golfer? One day she’ll be 30, let her act like she’s 30 then
September 19th, 2011 on 7:28 pm
The process might be there for a reason; but if she’s “old enough” to go thru Q school, then she’s old enough to gain exemption via that victory.
Anything else would be self-contradictory.
September 19th, 2011 on 7:52 pm
Don’t for a minute think that Inkster represents the feelings of all of the LPGA members. I guarantee that many, maybe half or more, see her as a threat to their already diminished earning ability. And I bet they have let Whan know it behind the scenes. That said, the LPGA has essentially already given her the waiver by allowing her to try for one of the ways to get your card (q school). So the waiver should apply to the other way (win a tourny). Future waivers to the next Diaper Dandies should contain the “either/or” language as well.
September 19th, 2011 on 8:26 pm
Be unfair to her run her through Q school. Giving people what they think they deserve just leads them to become entitled. If you treat her unfair that will just give her a chip on her shoulder. The more she wants to prove herself, the less vulnerable she is shrink in big moments when the pressure’s on. Just my 2 cents.
September 19th, 2011 on 8:35 pm
SJ — Threat to the other players’ earning ability? First, so what? Play better. Second, Lexi’s presence could enhance their earning ability? Didn’t players feel the same threat about Tiger in 1996? I think it turned out well for their pocketbooks.
Not comparing Lexi to Tiger, but it could work out for the tour in a similar fashion.
September 19th, 2011 on 8:36 pm
Let’s give Whan a week or two to puff his chest out, then allow reality to set in.
The LPGA already opened the gate by letting Lexi go to Q School at 16. She qualified to be a member of the tour at that event. Now she is a a member of the tour, the LPGA is legally bound to treat her the same as they would any other, age-qualified member of the LPGA.
If Whan holds his stand to make her re-qualify after winning a scantioned event, there would be a damaging lawsuit that the LPGA would certainly lose, and can ill afford.
September 19th, 2011 on 8:40 pm
@Gannon There was a lot of jealousy towards Tiger when he first came on tour
September 19th, 2011 on 9:13 pm
LPGA Commissioner Mike Whan should have been the first one to shake her hand and present her with her LPGA card when she walked off the 18th green on Sunday. If he was as savvy as many say he is, he should have had it all worked out with Lexi’s people Saturday when it was apparent that she would win the Navistar.
This is a special case and it deserved special treatment by the LPGA which is struggling to remain relevant.
Commissioner Whan has until next Tuesday (the first day of Stage 2 of the LPGA Q School) to grant the waiver and give Lexi immediate membership in the LPGA. If he misses that deadline and she is forced to continue the Q School process I will be stunned.
Whan says he wants to “build the LPGA brand.” He has already missed a golden opportunity to maximize publicity and generate new interest in the struggling tour.
September 19th, 2011 on 9:23 pm
@Dave – why is she different/special than the next 16 year old to win a tourney. She will not have to go to Q school if she files the right paperwork, just like anyone else. He is not a dictator, and has to work within the parameters set forth in the LPGA’s rules.
September 19th, 2011 on 11:18 pm
Gannon: not saying it is rational to try to limit your competition, just saying it is natural. Besides, I would be a little cautious about your “her presence will grow the tour and thus the earning possibilities” argument. They said the same thing about Paula…and about Morgan…and about Michelle. And yet the tour continues to lose events. In fact, another one just disintegrated last week.
September 19th, 2011 on 11:42 pm
This whole issue is about lazy older members of the tour not maintaining their games in order to stave off naturally talented 16 yr olds. If the female pros put in the range and putting/short game time that the men do, 16 yr olds winning by a staggering five shots would not happen. I know that females develop faster than males in terms of approaching peak talent earlier, but Thompson’s performance is an absolute indictment against the work ethic of a lot of established players. These established players want to protect there apparent financial annuity while engaging in distractions, social media, etc as their skill levels drift away.
September 20th, 2011 on 1:49 am
@BrianS wrote “why is she different/special than the next 16 year old to win”?
It took 61 years for Lexi to become the FIRST 16 year old to win. So Lexi might not be any different from the next 16 year old to win on the LPGA tour, but that might not happen again in your lifetime.
September 20th, 2011 on 9:21 am
I heard she is gonna join the ranks of the belly putter in her next tournament. That will make her a dominant figure on the LPGA Tour. Her current gifts plus that “illegal” belly wand will proplel her past the greatness of both Annika, Lorena, and Hanni Yanni.
September 20th, 2011 on 1:01 pm
Tour card or not, just stay away from swing gurus, and she will do fine.
September 20th, 2011 on 1:21 pm
She should skip Q-school entirely. How many sponsor or special exemptions can she get on the LPGA for 2012 without going to Q-school? She could be a great product for their tour. She brings something different to the LPGA which could boost the US fan base and sponsors (cha ching = REVENUE). Does it really make sense to not have a winner of the 2011 season ineligible for 2012. Didn’t she prove herself with a win? The LPGA is struggling with sponsorships, pretty sure the sponsors would not be happy if she couldn’t compete in 2012. LPGA do the right thing…Lexi could be the next best thing that could boost your tour. Worst case, she doesn’t qualify at Q-school, her spot goes to a foreigner that does not speak english, the sponsors that play with the foreigner at the 2012 Pro-Ams have a terrible experience & decide their money should be spent elsewhere in 2013.
September 20th, 2011 on 2:17 pm
Maybe she should play on the LPGA tour and gain more experience while sticking it to the Ladies Professional Golf Association.
September 20th, 2011 on 2:20 pm
I hope she doesnt take the Michelle Wie route and try her hand on the PGA tour. That would be a mistake. She may want to try the Nationwide to gain some real expericence.
September 20th, 2011 on 2:22 pm
@Einhorn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
September 20th, 2011 on 2:42 pm
How is she driving the ball so far? HGH?
September 20th, 2011 on 3:02 pm
I guess I’m not shocked that the overhype machine is in full motion. She’s played 8 times this year, missed 4 cuts, and this (awesome) Win is her first top 10. She did a little better last year, making 4 of 6 cuts, along with 2 Top 10′s. Her scoring average has gone up in 2011 vs 2010. I have 0 doubt that her career will follow an upward trajectory, but if you read some of the above, she will win every week that she enters. Also, coming into this week (or after the first round) there was alot of talk about how well she has done on this particular golf course. I would bet anyone $100 that she will not have to go through Q school, and will be on Tour in 2012. Hopefully she is one of several great American young players in the LPGA for the next few years, which is what I think they need more than 1 dominant player.
September 20th, 2011 on 10:01 pm
This is really about a market opportunity. Yeah, sure she can get in via XYZ process, but the comish needs to play this up. The LPGA is FLAT in interest and needs to buzz. I love watching them, and look forward to a few tournaments in person next year, but, let’s keep some momentum going on the excitement.
September 20th, 2011 on 10:18 pm
@Sahalee Joe Not one mention of M. Wie in a story she has nothing to do with until your comment. A wie bit obsessed Joe?
September 20th, 2011 on 10:39 pm
She should tell the LPGA to stuff it and go play in Europe or Asia just for the hell of it.
September 20th, 2011 on 11:40 pm
She looks like a Stifler from American Pie…
September 21st, 2011 on 9:10 am
This girl is a big part of the future of the LPGA. The LPGA has to handle this in a very respectable manner that is in the best interests of future players and present players. It also has a responsibility to all the sponsers. This is an easy decision: let her petition the LPGA for membership for the win and ALLOW her a membership. She is a rare find and the LPGA should at any expense welcome her with open arms including the existing members also welcoming her. She has the potential to increase the sponsership and the money amounts which make it better for existing members which happened to the PGA tour when Tiger Woods entered the game.